Thursday, 21 June 2012

ARTICLE: What Does It Take to Become a Legend?








Icon: a person regarded as a representative symbol or as worthy of 
        veneration



Legendan extremely famous or notorious person, especially in a particular                   
             field - the man was a living legend
                      a screen legend

With the digital era and its corresponding increase in single sales, has come the misuse of various terms. Previously used to indicate the superiority of certain videos, shoots and musicians, words such as 'epic', 'legendary', 'legend' and 'icon' have become commonplace; used to refer to the most base in the music industry. This has led to such words, in essence, being rendered completely meaningless and it has become quite clear to many that their true meanings must be re-established. 

This article intends to reinforce the meaning of both 'icon' and 'legend', as well as determine the necessary criteria for an artist to realise both statuses. It shall also hypothesise the musicians of today who could potentially see the attachment of the aforementioned words to their resume in the near future. 




Allow us first to address the true meaning of 'icon'. If we're going by the above definition (as stated in the Oxford Dictionary), then an icon is merely a representative symbol of something. It follows on, therefore, that icons (particularly those 'of the moment') can be replaced if someone else emerges who is proficient in that particular area. Fashion is a notoriously fickle area in which this is apparent. One only has to take the example of model Agyness Deyn. Cited as a style icon as recently as 2008, she has since fallen into relative obscurity with the likes of Rosie Huntington-Whiteley having arguably taken her place. 

This is a similar case in music. Popular 90s artists like Hanson, Tevin Campbell, Shanice and even the still-popular Monica were all referred to as icons at the time, and have all since seen a change in circumstances. It is doubtful that many would refer to them as music icons, today, though Monica could still be rightfully deemed as an icon of 90s R&B. Still, it is clear that, with changing trends, icons are often replaced. That, or the field in which they were originally mooted as being iconic in, is considerably narrowed.

It is therefore easier for an artist or celebrity to see iconic status. Indeed, all that is necessary to realise it is considerable success or notoriety in a certain field, or for that person to bring about a noticeable change (however small) to it. 

As such, it is also easy for artists or celebrities to be deemed 'icons' early on in their careers. Artists like Lady Gaga (who was cited as being a fashion icon less than year after her debut) and models like Rosie Huntington-Whiteley have seen such status while being relatively 'green' in their respective fields. 

'Legendary' status, however, is considerably harder to achieve and it is what this article primarily intends to focus on. It also must be stated that, while legends are always also icons, icons are not always also legends. With 'legend' being defined as 
an extremely famous or notorious person, especially in a particular field...
legends are almost impossible to replace due to the fact that the criteria to realise such status is much more discerning and most are simply incapable of meeting them. 

For artists, record sales are just one area in which they must see considerable success. Musicians like Michael Jackson, Elvis Presley and the Beatles have all sold a reported one billion records. These numbers are astonishing, but, as they are so incredibly high, it would be unrealistic and foolish to make them a prerequisite for legendary status. Hence, other musicians like Madonna and Mariah Carey (who have both sold over 200 million records) are also deemed legends - and rightfully so. 

But incredible record sales alone are not enough for 'legend' status to be granted. Artists must also bring about a considerable change in the industry as we know it; they must shake the very foundation of music. This includes iconic videos and the calibre of their respective catalogues, as well as various paraphernalia. The possession of numerous hit songs goes without saying, as well as critically acclaimed records and eras, and at least three memorable and notable performances. They must also have the respect of their peers and superiors in the industry; the approval of established musical legends must be obtained and known publicly. Another prerequisite is that they enjoy (even comparative) success throughout a lengthy career (or for a substantial portion of it).

Arguably, the best example of an artist who possessed all the aforementioned is the King of Pop, Michael Jackson. As well as essentially creating the music video as we know it, he has several iconic songs and albums, record-breaking tours and is cited as the inspiration behind the careers of almost every artist since. In addition, his noteworthy career spanned almost four decades.

One would think that it was obvious, but it has become increasingly apparent that the following is far from it. Extraordinary talent is the most important quality necessary for an artist to see legendary status. Whether it be in vocals (Mariah Carey and Whitney Houston), dancing (Michael Jackson), performing (again, Michael Jackson) or general musicianship (the Beatles, Prince), those who wish to realise it must have it in their possession. 

Now, it is expected that some will argue that Madonna, the Queen of Pop, does not have any such extraordinary talent in any of those areas. However, she brought about considerable change in the music industry and rocked its' very foundations. It also must be argued that she is basically the 'mother' of every female pop artist since her debut (and this generation, in particular). No other pop female artist has had such influence. Hence, she has more than earned her legendary status. 

Allow us to propose two artists whom we believe will eventually see legendary status: Beyoncé and Britney Spears. As well as having outlasted many of their peers and having careers spanning almost fifteen years, they have had considerable influence over the latest generation of artists. They have both had several sold-out world tours, massive chart success, numerous notable performances and are already icons of their generation. They have the approval and respect of the legends that have gone before them (with Beyoncé often being touted as 'the greatest performer of this generation', and even 'the greatest performer since Michael'), as well as the general public.

Additionally, Beyoncé and Britney have sold over 120 million records each and, while that cannot compare to the sales of the artists of yesteryear, one must take into consideration the time during which they were sold. They both debuted at a time when CD piracy was at an all-time high and before the start of the digital era which has seen many sub-par artists enjoy considerable success in terms of single sales. Their successful peers, Justin Timberlake and Christina Aguilera, haven't seen similar sales despite also doing very well, and the Princess of Pop and Queen B are two of the best-selling artists of the last decade. 

Conclusively, let us reiterate the importance of not allowing the terms 'icon' and 'legend' to be rendered meaningless through misuse. They also must not be used interchangeably. Icons are representative symbols. They are more easily replaced and indeed often are in the fickle fields of fashion and music. Just five years ago, Agyness Deyn and Keira Knightley were the darlings of the day; cited as fashion and style icons and seated front row at various fashion shows. Today, the likes or Rihanna and Rosie Huntington-Whiteley have replaced them. Tomorrow, who knows? 

Legends, on the other hand, are almost impossible to replace. Unlike many icons, their names go down in history, generation to generation. Marilyn Monroe, Audrey Hepburn, James Dean, Marlon Brando, Elvis Presley, Michael Jackson, the Beatles, Madonna, Mariah Carey, Whitney Houston, James Brown: those are legends. They are not only representatives of particular fields and prone to irrelevancy once a particular genre or style falls out of favour; their names are synonymous with the greatness they, themselves, achieved, notable for the change that they, themselves, brought about.

There is a distinct difference between being an icon and a legend, one that must not go ignored, and undeservedly boasting certain people (Katy Perry and Rihanna, particularly, come to mind) as being either is both foolish and derogatory to those that have actually earned such status. 

23 comments:

  1. This basically should be printed and given to every Stan who thinks their Fave is a Legend.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This articles shows that just because you were once an "Icon" ( Agyness Deyn) it wont make you a legend (Michael Jackson)

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think next in line to the Legend lane, is Usher, Britney, & Beyonce.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Usher, with his mega mediocre music ? Not a legend, artistically, in any way, shape or form.

      Delete
  4. Loved it. It respects the past legends but also keeps and open mind that modern day artists are also on the road to such status, and the choice of Bey and Britney is appropriate. The final paragraph is a personal favorite as well, as too often, these 'singles artists' are being named legends by their extremely delusional 'stan base' - LOVED IT :)

    ReplyDelete
  5. With Beyonce's next album & A Star Is Born she will most def. be a LEGEND

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Her music is way too middle of the road, though. Not a legend.

      Delete
  6. Next in line: Beyoncé & Britney...next, Gaga, and next? Who knows...

    ReplyDelete
  7. Along with Brit and Bey, Gaga will also reach legendary status. She already met some of the qualifications. She has respect and love from her peers and there are so many legends already who have praised her (Madonna, MJ, Whitney, Sir Paul McCartney and the praise of soon-to-be legends: Bey and Brit). She has at least 1 memorable performance with the 2009 VMAs. Her Monsterball tour was the highest grossing of a debut artist, her BTW Ball is her 2nd worldwide tour and selling out stadiums (and it's during a lower point of her career with respect to album and single sales), someone like Justin Bieber and Nicki Minaj can never say they can do, and has the biggest stage. We all know Gaga is an amazing vocalist and always sings live which is a plus. Dancing isn't her strong point like it is for Bey and MJ but her voice and talents on several instruments make up for that. She has sold about 100 million records in the short time she has been in the music industry, many of her contemporaries cannot say that even when they have been in the industry longer (example: Rihanna). Gaga will probably not see legendary status as soon as Bey and Brit will but as long as she keeps going like she has been, she will definitely see legendary status within the next several years.

    Side comment: Great job with the article! Unbiased and should shut up those who say their fave is a legend when they are clearly not!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's EXACTLY how we feel. She's seen such success in a very short period of time. The only thing she lacks is longevity. It is important to remember that many a star has come, burnt bright and burned out. In another decade or so, Gaga will no doubt achieve legendary status if her career continues in a similar trajectory.

      Delete
    2. But.... why you put an 18 yr old boy here? JB yes overrated, but the most successful teen, constantly treated as a grown artist in his mid 20s. NO. Credit for him in a lot of stuff and if he keeps growing he will do amazing things, so far he deserves respect.

      Delete
    3. "Lady Gaga" is mega generic. Nothing she does is new.

      Delete
    4. None mentioned are legendary.

      Delete
    5. Mother Monster may become a legend in 10-15 years. Also, she hasn't sold 100 Million records. Longevity and influence, I believe, are prerequisites for legendary status. Bey and Brit have it, though Brit seems to be on the fade now. Also, may I suggest Celine Dion to the legends. She has equal sales to Mariah and more than Whitney, has had a longer career than both, still performs unbelievably well and is probably one of the most recognized voices worldwide, thanks no small part to MHWGO. (I say this from experience, as even the people in my country who have no idea of pop music, know this song and love it and her, along with MJ)

      Delete
  8. Non-biased and informative article. Although I am in the hive, Beyonce is not a legend yet. I would give her at least 2 or 3 more albums/eras to be considered a legend.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Liked the article and could agree more about the content and the blogger - non biased and very informative as always

    ReplyDelete
  10. I liked the article, this was informative and great article.
    Eminem on Facebook

    ReplyDelete
  11. beyoncè has never sold 120 millions!
    you can`t compare her sales as solo and as a Group

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. solo, yes. she has sold over 100 million

      Delete
  12. Why can't you combine the solo and the group? They both were apart of her career weren't they?

    ReplyDelete
  13. Whitney,Mariah,Michael,Madonna and Prince are among the last legends. and janet

    ReplyDelete